Jack Moore Jack Moore's Profile Page

Jack Moore Jack Moore

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Free PDF Quiz 2025 Perfect Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate: Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Online Exam

DOWNLOAD the newest FreeDumps Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1p1QH-jPjXWnUlSs9u7MG6cpBcbwTsBmR

It is understandable that different people have different preference in terms of Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study guide. Taking this into consideration, and in order to cater to the different requirements of people from different countries in the international market, we have prepared three kinds of versions of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Preparation questions in this website, namely, PDF version, APP online and software version, and you can choose any one of them as you like. You will our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps are the best!

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

Topic 2

Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.

Topic 3

Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.

Topic 4

Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
licensing requirements in this topic.

Topic 5

Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Online Exam <<

Pass Guaranteed Quiz Databricks - Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate - Professional Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Online Exam

Our clients come from all around the world and our company sends the products to them quickly. The clients only need to choose the version of the product, fill in the correct mails and pay for our Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate guide dump. Then they will receive our mails in 5-10 minutes. Once the clients click on the links they can use our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials immediately. If the clients can’t receive the mails they can contact our online customer service and they will help them solve the problem. Finally the clients will receive the mails successfully. The purchase procedures are simple and the delivery of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study tool is fast.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q46-Q51):

NEW QUESTION # 46
A Generative Al Engineer has created a RAG application to look up answers to questions about a series of fantasy novels that are being asked on the author's web forum. The fantasy novel texts are chunked and embedded into a vector store with metadata (page number, chapter number, book title), retrieved with the user' s query, and provided to an LLM for response generation. The Generative AI Engineer used their intuition to pick the chunking strategy and associated configurations but now wants to more methodically choose the best values.
Which TWO strategies should the Generative AI Engineer take to optimize their chunking strategy and parameters? (Choose two.)

A. Pass known questions and best answers to an LLM and instruct the LLM to provide the best token count. Use a summary statistic (mean, median, etc.) of the best token counts to choose chunk size.
B. Create an LLM-as-a-judge metric to evaluate how well previous questions are answered by the most appropriate chunk. Optimize the chunking parameters based upon the values of the metric.
C. Change embedding models and compare performance.
D. Choose an appropriate evaluation metric (such as recall or NDCG) and experiment with changes in the chunking strategy, such as splitting chunks by paragraphs or chapters.
Choose the strategy that gives the best performance metric.
E. Add a classifier for user queries that predicts which book will best contain the answer. Use this to filter retrieval.

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
To optimize a chunking strategy for a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application, the Generative AI Engineer needs a structured approach to evaluating the chunking strategy, ensuring that the chosen configuration retrieves the most relevant information and leads to accurate and coherent LLM responses.
Here's whyCandEare the correct strategies:
Strategy C: Evaluation Metrics (Recall, NDCG)
* Define an evaluation metric: Common evaluation metrics such as recall, precision, or NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) measure how well the retrieved chunks match the user's query and the expected response.
* Recallmeasures the proportion of relevant information retrieved.
* NDCGis often used when you want to account for both the relevance of retrieved chunks and the ranking or order in which they are retrieved.
* Experiment with chunking strategies: Adjusting chunking strategies based on text structure (e.g., splitting by paragraph, chapter, or a fixed number of tokens) allows the engineer to experiment with various ways of slicing the text. Some chunks may better align with the user's query than others.
* Evaluate performance: By using recall or NDCG, the engineer can methodically test various chunking strategies to identify which one yields the highest performance. This ensures that the chunking method provides the most relevant information when embedding and retrieving data from the vector store.
Strategy E: LLM-as-a-Judge Metric
* Use the LLM as an evaluator: After retrieving chunks, the LLM can be used to evaluate the quality of answers based on the chunks provided. This could be framed as a "judge" function, where the LLM compares how well a given chunk answers previous user queries.
* Optimize based on the LLM's judgment: By having the LLM assess previous answers and rate their relevance and accuracy, the engineer can collect feedback on how well different chunking configurations perform in real-world scenarios.
* This metric could be a qualitative judgment on how closely the retrieved information matches the user's intent.
* Tune chunking parameters: Based on the LLM's judgment, the engineer can adjust the chunk size or structure to better align with the LLM's responses, optimizing retrieval for future queries.
By combining these two approaches, the engineer ensures that the chunking strategy is systematically evaluated using both quantitative (recall/NDCG) and qualitative (LLM judgment) methods. This balanced optimization process results in improved retrieval relevance and, consequently, better response generation by the LLM.

NEW QUESTION # 47
A Generative AI Engineer developed an LLM application using the provisioned throughput Foundation Model API. Now that the application is ready to be deployed, they realize their volume of requests are not sufficiently high enough to create their own provisioned throughput endpoint. They want to choose a strategy that ensures the best cost-effectiveness for their application.
What strategy should the Generative AI Engineer use?

A. Switch to using External Models instead
B. Deploy the model using pay-per-token throughput as it comes with cost guarantees
C. Change to a model with a fewer number of parameters in order to reduce hardware constraint issues
D. Throttle the incoming batch of requests manually to avoid rate limiting issues

Answer: B

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs a cost-effective deployment strategy for an LLM application with relatively low request volume.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Switching to external models may not provide the required control or integration necessary for specific application needs.
* Option B: Using a pay-per-token model is cost-effective, especially for applications with variable or low request volumes, as it aligns costs directly with usage.
* Option C: Changing to a model with fewer parameters could reduce costs, but might also impact the performance and capabilities of the application.
* Option D: Manually throttling requests is a less efficient and potentially error-prone strategy for managing costs.
OptionBis ideal, offering flexibility and cost control, aligning expenses directly with the application's usage patterns.

NEW QUESTION # 48
A Generative AI Engineer wants to build an LLM-based solution to help a restaurant improve its online customer experience with bookings by automatically handling common customer inquiries. The goal of the solution is to minimize escalations to human intervention and phone calls while maintaining a personalized interaction. To design the solution, the Generative AI Engineer needs to define the input data to the LLM and the task it should perform.
Which input/output pair will support their goal?

A. Input: Customer reviews; Output: Classify review sentiment
B. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Buttons that represent choices for booking details
C. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions
D. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Cancellation options

Answer: B

Explanation:
Context: The goal is to improve the online customer experience in a restaurant by handling common inquiries about bookings, minimizing escalations, and maintaining personalized interactions.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Grouping and summarizing chat logs by user could provide insights into customer interactions but does not directly address the task of handling booking inquiries or minimizing escalations.
* Option B: Using chat logs to generate interactive buttons for booking details directly supports the goal of facilitating online bookings, minimizing the need for human intervention by providing clear, interactive options for customers to self-serve.
* Option C: Classifying sentiment of customer reviews does not directly help with booking inquiries, although it might provide valuable feedback insights.
* Option D: Providing cancellation options is helpful but narrowly focuses on one aspect of the booking process and doesn't support the broader goal of handling common inquiries about bookings.
Option Bbest supports the goal of improving online interactions by using chat logs to generate actionable items for customers, helping them complete booking tasks efficiently and reducing the need for human intervention.

NEW QUESTION # 49
A Generative Al Engineer is creating an LLM system that will retrieve news articles from the year 1918 and related to a user's query and summarize them. The engineer has noticed that the summaries are generated well but often also include an explanation of how the summary was generated, which is undesirable.
Which change could the Generative Al Engineer perform to mitigate this issue?

A. Provide few shot examples of desired output format to the system and/or user prompt.
B. Tune the chunk size of news articles or experiment with different embedding models.
C. Revisit their document ingestion logic, ensuring that the news articles are being ingested properly.
D. Split the LLM output by newline characters to truncate away the summarization explanation.

Answer: A

Explanation:
To mitigate the issue of the LLM including explanations of how summaries are generated in its output, the best approach is to adjust the training or prompt structure. Here's why Option D is effective:
* Few-shot Learning: By providing specific examples of how the desired output should look (i.e., just the summary without explanation), the model learns the preferred format. This few-shot learning approach helps the model understand not only what content to generate but also how to format its responses.
* Prompt Engineering: Adjusting the user prompt to specify the desired output format clearly can guide the LLM to produce summaries without additional explanatory text. Effective prompt design is crucial in controlling the behavior of generative models.
Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A: While technically feasible, splitting the output by newline and truncating could lead to loss of important content or create awkward breaks in the summary.
* B: Tuning chunk sizes or changing embedding models does not directly address the issue of the model's tendency to generate explanations along with summaries.
* C: Revisiting document ingestion logic ensures accurate source data but does not influence how the model formats its output.
By using few-shot examples and refining the prompt, the engineer directly influences the output format, making this approach the most targeted and effective solution.

NEW QUESTION # 50
After changing the response generating LLM in a RAG pipeline from GPT-4 to a model with a shorter context length that the company self-hosts, the Generative AI Engineer is getting the following error:

What TWO solutions should the Generative AI Engineer implement without changing the response generating model? (Choose two.)

A. Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model
B. Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents
C. Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi
D. Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database
E. Use a smaller embedding model to generate

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: After switching to a model with a shorter context length, the error message indicating that the prompt token count has exceeded the limit suggests that the input to the model is too large.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use a smaller embedding model to generate- This wouldn't necessarily address the issue of prompt size exceeding the model's token limit.
* Option B: Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model- This option affects the output length, not the size of the input being too large.
* Option C: Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents- This would help reduce the size of each document chunk fed into the model, ensuring that the input remains within the model's context length limitations.
* Option D: Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database- By retrieving fewer records, the total input size to the model can be managed more effectively, keeping it within the allowable token limits.
* Option E: Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi- Retraining the model is contrary to the stipulation not to change the response generating model.
OptionsCandDare the most effective solutions to manage the model's shorter context length without changing the model itself, by adjusting the input size both in terms of individual document size and total documents retrieved.

NEW QUESTION # 51
......

The free demos do honor to the perfection of our latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam torrent, and also a performance of our considerate after sales services. Those demos serve as epitomes of real Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate quiz guides for your reference. In our demos, some examples or question points were enumerated as some representatives of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Prep. How convenient and awesome of it! By the free trial services you can get close realization with our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate quiz guides, and know how to choose the perfect versions before your purchase.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Duration: https://www.freedumps.top/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-real-exam.html

BTW, DOWNLOAD part of FreeDumps Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1p1QH-jPjXWnUlSs9u7MG6cpBcbwTsBmR

Jack Moore Jack Moore

Biography

Quick Links

Resources

Support